Ad sense

Sunday, February 1, 2015

A case law that affects Divorce by Jurisdiction

The following is a decision by The Highest Civil Court in The United States of America after decision in Merit a number of Examples are to assist Counsel

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT May 6, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

No. 03-21091

Summary Calendar GUY RALPH PEREA, President of the United States; TAMMY DAWN PEREA, Vice President of the United States,

Petitioners-Appellants, versus GEORGE W. BUSH, Governor of Texas; HOUSTON INTERCONTINENTAL AIRPORT, also known as Bush Intercontinental Airport; KATHYN CASSIDY; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondents-Appellees.

------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-03-CV-3881

------------------- Before GARWOOD, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:*

Guy Ralph Perea and Tammy Dawn Perea, who are apparently a husband and wife

------------

The Jurisdiction takes Subject Matter on "apparently" from place of Marriage to place of Attempt of Divorce as related to Source of Property personal or otherwise

1. If married in Nevada then Divorce is done in Nevada otherwise if married in New York the Divorce is done in New York etc. etc.

2. If married in a State or National Park with No Entrance fee then the Divorce is done in a United States Court etc. etc.

3. If married in a Church and the minster or otherwise is ordain from the State of Idaho such Divorce is done in Idaho etc. etc.

4. If marriage from today 11:20 AM EDT February 2015 hereafter is not disclosed in a written understanding of property as disclosed into Source then such marriage is unlawful.

No comments:

Post a Comment