Ad sense

Friday, April 24, 2015

The 656 F.Supp. 237 allow Perea vs Bush etal,, etal,, request a New United States Postmaster General

656 F.Supp. 237 (1987)
Leonard JARRELL, Plaintiff,
Preston R. TISCH, et al., Defendants.
Civ. A. No. 83-2939.
United States District Court, District of Columbia.

February 18, 1987.
*238 Leonard Jarrell, Bethesda, Md., for plaintiff.

Robert E.L. Eaton, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., for defendants.

JOHN GARRETT PENN, District Judge.

Plaintiff has filed a pro se complaint against his employer, the United States Postal Service, and several other named defendants, alleging inter alia, that they wrongfully maintained certain records about him. This Court and the appellate court on appeal have characterized the complaint as alleging violations under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (1982) and the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a (1982). Whether or not the complaint is limited to these two claims is the pivotal question raised in defendants' motion to dismiss. Additionally, plaintiff has pending before this Court two motions for partial summary judgment and a motion to continue previously named Postmaster Generals as defendants and automatically substitute the new Postmaster General.

No comments:

Post a Comment